The Life You Can Save is a book about the philosophy known as “effective altruism.” It’s tough to critique the book without also discussing the philosophy, especially for someone (like me) who was previously unfamiliar with either. That’s why this book review is also a reflection on a moral philosophy. Author Peter Singer wastes no time introducing that philosophy. Section one (“THE ARGUMENT”), chapter 1 (“Saving a Child”) opens with a hypothetical situation which demonstrates the thesis.

Dear America is listed as a “Personal Memoir,” but it’d be more than a little ironic to get caught up on this book’s formal classification. Really, Vargas suggests a much more apt description in the book’s subtitle: “Notes of an Undocumented Citizen.” The book is made up of tiny chapters whose subject matter and tone vary from page to page. Sometimes defensive, sometimes grateful, sometimes indignant, Vargas steps through a range of emotions that, while somewhat lacking in coherence, reinforce his experience growing up full of fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

Edward Snowden’s always been an outlaw to me. That’s true for most people who know the name since it was only through whistleblowing that he became a public figure. While I’m among those who are grateful for his actions, I knew very little about the guy before reading Permanent Record. My ignorance was probably greater than most: I hadn’t read, heard, or seen anything about Snowden himself. My understanding of the events was limited to the subject of the disclosures–the NSA, XKeyscore, PRISM, etc.

Polarization in American politics seems to be splitting the country apart. The election of Donald Trump was a wake-up call for me (and many others, I’m sure), and with the way the impeachment process has been going, it doesn’t seem to be getting better. For me, the question has been: what can we do individually and collectively to improve faith and patience in American politics? My personal (read: woefully uninformed) perspective is that this has to do with a decline in social capital maintained by most American’s.

Stories of Your Life by Ted Chiang is a collection of short stories. The entries were published independently over the course of ten years, and as you might expect, there’s very little uniting them. From ancient Mesopotamia in “Tower of Babylon,” to the Victorian-era European city in “Seventy-Two Letters,” to the not-so-distant future of “Understand,” there’s no common setting or atmosphere. The narrative style varies, too: there’s traditional first-person (“Story of Your Life”) and third-person (“Division by Zero”) and also more unique non-fiction forms (like the transcript of a fictional documentary in “Liking What You See” and even an academic white paper in “The Evolution of Human Science”).

Like all good folklore, this tale starts with conformance tests. Test262 is the official test suite for the JavaScript programming language. From browsers to servers and even embedded systems, lots of projects “interpret” JavaScript, and Test262 is one way they make sure they’re doing it right. In 2014, there were a bunch of new features coming to the language, and the test suite needed a lot of work to include tests for all the new stuff.

Somehow, I was expecting a science fiction story, but The Circle is not that. It’s true that technology takes a central role, and some of it is slightly beyond what’s possible today. There’s even some light speculation (e.g. society’s ready adoption of a universal identification system, or The Circle’s purchase of Facebook’s data), but it’s conveyed in passing and taken for granted by author Dave Eggers and his characters. The story doesn’t hinge on any of this, though, so the unchallenged predictions aren’t so much plot holes as they are expressions of cynicism.

Even though I’m not much of a fantasy reader, I had high hopes for A Wizard of Earthsea. It came highly recommended, and even a quick scan of the Wikipedia page demonstrates that everyone has loved this book for years. It was more than just hearsay, though: from The Left Hand of Darkness, I’ve learned that author Ursula K. Le Guin is a technically strong writer and particularly adept at exploring challenging themes.

Which web browser are you using right now? It’s okay if you’re not sure. Actually, that would be a good sign. If you said, “I’m using Chrome 68 because that’s the only way I can pay my bills,” then that wouldn’t make the web (or your banking website) seem like such a friendly place. If your answer was more like, “I’m using whatever my niece installed because it works fine,” then as a web developer, I’m glad you don’t have to worry about it.

Many developers work on the “web platform” because they believe in the model of competing and interoperable implementations (i.e. browsers). These folks (of which I am one) believe that competing and interoperable implementations is what makes the web fundamentally stronger than other platforms. Unlike Windows, iOS, or Android (for example), the web’s users have choice about how they participate. If they disagree with how their chosen browser is being managed, they can switch to another.